After the alleged crime, the complainant sent a series of text messages to Mr Allan asking for more sex. In fact, she wanted violent sex and spoke about wanting to be raped. In a further round of texts, she made clear to a friend that no crime had been committed. This is the type of evidence which would hole a case below the water line and end a prosecution, and it did. But, only after two years. Two years of a 'living hell' for Mr Allan. The sadness, in this case, is that it could have been avoided. Mr Allan raised the issue of text messages in his police interview, but he was ignored. The officer in the case ignored clear guidelines on disclosure and did not bring them to the attention of the prosecuting barrister. It was only a very late intervention, three days into the trial, that uncovered what the police had known all along, that Mr Allan was innocent. So, in the end, all’s well that ends well. For Mr Allan, it will be a long time indeed before the scars of that period heal.

Ideally, we would like to tell you that Mr Allan's case is a 'one-off', but we cannot. Disclosure has been a fault line in criminal justice for decades, as illustrated by dozens of high profile miscarriage of justice cases. We know that these cases are only the tip of the iceberg and that every single day the liberty of people standing trial is put at risk due to disclosure failures. We are acutely aware of this situation, and all of our staff work relentlessly to ensure that all relevant evidence is revealed. From first police disclosure, right through to trial applications, we do not rest until satisfied that our client's cases are prepared to the very highest of standards.

For any crime related query contact Rob Barley Tel: 01502 533020 or email:



Share |

Make an enquiry

Form by ChronoForms -

Latest News


© 2019 Norton Peskett. All Rights Reserved.

Norton Peskett Solicitors